In an interview with《The Icons》APAC, a UK-based media outlet focusing on global leadership influence, Guo described the atmosphere at that moment not as boisterous, but as a grounded feeling of “knowing which direction to take”:

“This sense of assurance actually stems from a rather challenging starting point. The National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI) in the United States has already traversed half a century. However, in Taiwan, investor relations has long been regarded as a subsidiary function, lacking institutional support and a professional community.”

It was against this backdrop in 2018 that Guo, together with several corporate spokespersons and CFOs, founded TIRI. Without corporate sponsorship or existing resources, what sustained the association’s initial progress was merely a shared belief in professional value. Guo consistently emphasized that the most difficult part of establishing an association is not the initial step, but ensuring its long-term sustainability. Only when value is institutionalized can the profession endure beyond personnel changes. This idea gradually became the most important consensus within the association and laid the foundation for TIRI’s development direction.

Looking back seven years later, TIRI is no longer just a collection of advocates but has become a professional community recognized by the market and responded to by the system. The discussions among association members have also evolved from “how to communicate information clearly” to “how to integrate investor relations into the decision-making layer.”

From Disclosure to Governance: The Repositioning of the IR Role

As the association gradually took shape, the first issue to emerge was precisely the position of IR within corporate governance. Reflecting on the association’s development, Kevin Wang, Vice Chairman of TIRI and Chairman of Nanchang Creative Sensor Technology Co., Ltd., pointed out that while Taiwanese companies have made significant progress in the completeness of information disclosure, IR is still often misunderstood as a one-way communication tool.

In his view, investor relations is a governance discipline that combines professional ethics and international standards. It involves not just explaining information, but building long-term trust. For this reason, he hopes that while aligning with international practices, the association can gradually become a platform for corporate governance exchange, allowing institutional dialogue to transcend mere regulatory compliance.

This governance perspective is also reflected in the overall structure of the capital market. Freddie Liu, Executive Director of TIRI and Senior Vice President, Chief Strategy Officer & Deputy Spokesperson of TPK Holding Co., Ltd., also pointed out that the association is playing a bridging role between Taiwan and the international capital market. By facilitating information flow and professional dialogue, IR not only serves companies but is also influencing the overall perception of Taiwan in the market.

Observing from an institutional level, Jack M. Chang, Executive Director of TIRI and Vice President of Finance at Allgenesis Biotherapeutics Inc., noted that while the corporate governance evaluation system has continuously evolved in recent years, many companies still view IR as part of the disclosure process rather than as an integral part of the governance structure. He believes the association should more actively act as a communication node between enterprises and regulatory authorities, enabling IR to truly enter the governance system rather than remaining in a peripheral role.

Industry Experience and International Narrative: Enabling Taiwan to Be Truly Understood

As the governance role becomes clearer, another key point repeatedly mentioned is international communication. Andy Chien, Executive Director of TIRI and Head of the Corporate Governance Center & Spokesperson of TECO Electric & Machinery Co., Ltd., pointed out that Taiwanese companies possess high resilience and innovation capabilities in the global market, but there is still room for deepening their capital narrative and international communication.

This challenge manifests in different forms across various industries. Fu-Fu Shen, Director of TIRI and former Deputy Head of the Finance Division & Deputy Spokesperson of Chunghwa Telecom Co., Ltd., believes that the association itself must maintain a high level of knowledge flow. Through case sharing and workshops, experiences scattered across different industries can be organized, accumulated, and gradually transformed into transferable professional knowledge.

From a corporate operational standpoint, Nan-Hao Lin, Director of TIRI and General Manager of Chi Shan Long Feng Food Co., Ltd., pointed out that for Taiwanese companies to establish a firm foothold in the international capital market, the key lies not in technology, but in the ability to speak a language that investors understand. In his view, the association is precisely the vital platform to assist companies in completing this crucial task of translation.

Education and Talent: The Key to Institutional Sustainability

As the system gradually takes form, the association has come to realize that “people” are the key to its long-term continuation. Cash Hong, Director of TIRI and Manager of the Investor Relations Division at JPP Holding Company Limited, views IR education as a long-term responsibility. He promotes a localized IR cultivation program, hoping to enable companies in central and southern Taiwan, as well as small and medium-sized enterprises, to participate in international market dialogue, preventing the system from being concentrated only among a few large corporations.

Regarding institutionalized education, Tina Chang, Director of TIRI and Department Head of Investor Relations & Deputy Spokesperson at Compal Electronics, Inc., pointed out that the association has released the Chinese version of the “Investor Relations Body of Knowledge” and held the inaugural TIRIC certification course. This is more than just the launch of educational materials; it is a crucial step towards establishing a common language for the IR profession.

On a practical level for companies going global, Peter Chang, Director of TIRI, Special Assistant to the Chairman & Spokesperson of Lelon Electronics Corp., reminds that for companies to truly “compete on a world stage,” they cannot remain solely in the Taiwanese market; they must achieve comprehensive integration with international capital markets, governance structures, and professional systems.

Starting from the practice of corporate communication, Frank Wang, Director of TIRI and former Senior Manager of the Public Relations Department & Spokesperson at AVerMedia Technologies, Inc., pointed out that investor relations is not just an information disclosure process but a bridge for building long-term trust between a company and the market. If companies wish to enhance their international visibility, they must simultaneously strengthen their IR professional capabilities and media narrative strategies, allowing corporate value to be understood by the market in a transparent and compelling manner. He believes the association should continue to promote a corporate co-learning mechanism, transforming IR expertise from individual company experience into a shared institutional asset for the industry.

Continuing the discussion on talent development, Nancy Hsu, Director of TIRI, Special Assistant to the President & Spokesperson of FineTek Co., Ltd., pointed out that IR involves multiple facets including finance, legal affairs, communications, and sustainability. Without long-term training and further education, it is difficult to form a genuine professional community. She hopes the association can establish a more comprehensive training framework, providing a clear career path for talent.

Sustainability and Trust: The Ultimate Destination of Governance Culture

As systems and talent gradually fall into place, sustainability is no longer just an ancillary issue but has become part of the governance culture. Tom Huang, Director of TIRI and Head of the Investor Relations & Sustainability Office at Sitronix Technology Corp., points out that the association’s role extends beyond education; it also involves facilitating institutional dialogue between regulatory bodies and the market, fostering positive interaction between policy and practice.

Within the context of the technology industry, Ant Lan, Director of TIRI and General Manager of Algoltek, Inc., also notes that Taiwan’s technological capabilities have long been world-class. The real challenge lies in how to translate these achievements into a governance narrative that international investors can understand.

From a corporate sustainability governance perspective, Nick Huang, Director of TIRI and Manager of the Investor Relations & Sustainability Committee at Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd., emphasizes that only by centering on transparency and openness can investors perceive a company’s long-term commitment through its governance mechanisms.

Observing from the supervisors’ group, Wen-Chun Yao, Supervisor of TIRI and Special Assistant to the Chairman & Spokesperson of FSP TECHNOLOGY INC., believes the association should further guide policy advocacy, fostering synergy between the government and industry.

Julia Chen, Supervisor of TIRI and Chief Sustainability Officer of Lining-ESG Corporation, points out that true sustainability is not an additional burden but a natural outcome of a mature governance culture.

Similarly from a governance standpoint, Paul Yeh, Supervisor of TIRI and Associate Manager of the Administration Department & Spokesperson at USERJOY TECHNOLOGY CO., LTD., emphasizes that enhancing the overall investor relations literacy is equivalent to improving the quality of Taiwan’s capital market.

Echo Wan, Supervisor of TIRI and Independent Director of Complex Micro Interconnection Co.,Ltd., adds that by introducing international IR standards and practices, Taiwanese companies can demonstrate a more mature governance profile in the global market.

From System to Culture: A Path Taking Shape

At the advisory level, David Yang, Honorary Advisor of TIRI and Managing Director of the Securities Analysts Association Chinese Taipei, cautions that many boards still view IR as an extension of public relations rather than the starting point for long-term value communication. This is precisely an area where the association needs to continuously work.

Kevin Yu, Chief Advisor of TIRI, notes from a macro perspective that Taiwan should not merely imitate international best practices but should establish two-way learning and cooperation mechanisms, allowing the system to evolve continuously.

As the integrator of the association’s operations, Judy Hsu, Secretary-General of TIRI, describes her role as a “translator,” converting the languages of different industries and professions into a public policy language that the association can communicate externally. She points out that when the board members begin discussing the “next generation,” the association is no longer just an organization but a professional ecosystem capable of continuous self-renewal.

Chairman Jonny Zong-Lin Guo concludes by stating that the essence of IR is not “making information look better,” but embedding trust into the system and placing value into the long-term narrative. If Taiwanese companies continue to treat IR as an extension of PR, they risk remaining in short-term reaction mode; true competitiveness lies in enabling the board, management team, and capital market to discuss risks, strategy, governance, and sustainability using the same logic, allowing the market to see not just financial figures but verifiable governance quality and long-term resilience:

“Looking towards 2026, what TIRI needs to do is not issue another advocacy statement, but to actually create the ‘common language’. Advancing systems and methodologies, deepening education and talent supply, and incorporating the ‘next generation’ into training and succession mechanisms. This ensures the profession can be passed on, the system can iterate, and the association can continue to self-renew, driving companies towards the global stage.”

Recommend for you:

Jonny Zong-Lin Guo, Chairman of Taiwan Investor Relations Institute: The Value of IR Lies in Making Trust Verifiable

CAMentrepreneurs Taipei 101 ESG Forum: Governance Sets the Ceiling for Trust Capital

The post From Disclosure to Decision-Making: How Investor Relations is Rewriting the Language of the Boardroom first appeared on The Icons.

As a crucial hub in the global supply chain, Taiwan possesses solid technological foundations and industrial strength, yet has long faced the structural dilemma of “insufficient visibility.” Many companies have strength and sincerity but lack sufficient voice and narrative dominance in the currents of international capital markets. Precisely because of this, how to make Taiwanese companies heard by the world has become a critical issue in contemporary capital governance.

In an exclusive interview with the UK-based global leadership impact media《The Icons》,  Jonny Zong-Lin Guo, Chairman of the Taiwan Investor Relations Institute (TIRI), stated, “IR is not just about information disclosure; it’s a bridge for the market to understand your true value.” He believes that as the pace of the investment market accelerates, only by establishing a rhythm of transparency and trust can corporate value transcend volatility and be remembered long-term. For Guo, the ultimate goal of IR is to make integrity and professionalism the common language for Taiwan to go global:

“The essence of IR is to let the market see the reality, not just the appearance of being seen. When companies understand how to be understood, trust naturally becomes their strongest capital.”

From Expertise to Institution: Making Trust a Form of Governance

Jonny Zong-Lin Guo’s understanding of investor relations stems from years of practical experience in the capital markets. Having long interacted with institutional investors, regulators, and analysts, he has witnessed how information asymmetry can lead to good companies being undervalued and how communication gaps can cause trust to erode. “That’s when I understood that IR cannot be treated as marketing; it is a governance profession,” he recalls his early realizations. “The US National Investor Relations Institute (NIRI) has existed for half a century, but Taiwan still lacked its own institutions and community.”

In 2018, he decided to take action, gathering dozens of spokespersons and CFOs to co-found the Taiwan Investor Relations Institute. It was a journey starting from scratch, without corporate backing or existing resources, only a group of people who believed that professionalism could change the market. “Many seniors told me that the hardest part of establishing an association isn’t starting, but surviving,” Guo admits the early days were tough, but he always held firm to one belief: value must be institutionalized for professionalism to be respected:

“Expertise must be verifiable to be trusted. When business leaders can instantly recognize the value of professionalism, the cost of market communication decreases, and the speed of trust increases accordingly.”

Guo views the establishment of TIRI as a long-term market-building effort. The association’s role is not just about networking, but about integrating scattered experiences into followable standards. He believes IR should become a shared governance language between companies and investors. “We hope to transform experience into methods, turn methods into standards, and allow professionalism to take root within the industry.”

Over the years, Guo has evolved from a financial staff member to a practitioner driving institutional development. This role change has also shown him the weight of another kind of responsibility. Promoting TIRI is, for him, a long-term commitment to enable Taiwanese companies to be understood, trusted, and seen in the global market.

Jonny Zong-Lin Guo: As Market Cap Grows, Connections Must Keep Pace

Last autumn, the global investment community’s attention unexpectedly focused on Taiwan, with multiple reports indicating that the total market capitalization of the Taiwan stock market had surpassed that of Germany, ranking eighth globally. For most, this was a milestone worth celebrating; for Jonny Zong-Lin Guo, it felt more like a silent test.

“Market cap moving forward is a fact, but international connections remain relatively thin, that is also a fact,” Guo stated. He noted that growth also means increased responsibility, because when the world starts paying attention to you, the standards by which you are measured become stricter.

Guo recalled his trip to Europe in September 2025, visiting exchanges and IR associations in several countries, from Frankfurt to Bulgaria and then Istanbul. It was more than just a visit; it was a profound observation. “The world knows Taiwan is strong in the supply chain, but they find it difficult to name specific companies. It’s not that the companies aren’t good enough; it’s that we haven’t actively told the world why they are good.”

In his view, information asymmetry is the biggest market fault line. If companies focus solely on operations and neglect communication, they will ultimately be categorized merely as “silent forces” in the international market.

“Among Taiwan’s over 1,900 listed and OTC companies, silence equals invisibility.” For Guo, investor relations is not just about information disclosure, but a demonstration of responsibility. “The core of IR is to make trustworthy companies understood.” He believes that international capital values efficiency, and the market always rewards companies willing to clearly articulate their story and consistently build trust.

Guo is convinced that only when companies learn to replace silence with dialogue and speculation with trust on the international stage can Taiwan’s 8th place market cap truly translate into deeper influence.

What the Market Rewards is Verifiable Honesty

In Jonny Zong-Lin Guo’s view, the value of investor relations ultimately gets quantified in the market. It’s not just an act of communication, but a practice of governance. He often uses these two distinct examples to illustrate what he means by “professionalism speaks.”

The first is the joint material information conference held by Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd and TECO, represented by Hon Hai spokesperson Wu Chun-Yi and TECO spokesperson Chien Shih-Hsiung. The conference announced a strategic alliance through a share swap to jointly deploy global Artificial Intelligence (AI) data centers. At that press conference, standing at the front were not the chairmen, but the spokespersons and investor relations heads of both parties. There were no slogans, only professional explanations and precise information. “I knew clearly that when professionalism is placed at the forefront, market trust follows on its own.” That brief public explanation became a turning point for Taiwan’s capital market. Subsequently, the stock prices of both companies rose simultaneously, with market capitalization reflecting the market’s reward for transparent communication. “When investors trust your information, they respond with real money.” This is the conclusion he has drawn from repeated observation.

The second example serves as a somber warning. It concerns a company with a long history of poor governance ratings and insufficient information disclosure, where warning signs were already present in public data. Guo points out that if a company chooses to ignore these signs, it’s effectively leaving risk to chance. The eventual outcome wasn’t just financial loss, but a chain reaction of collapsing trust. “IR is not a fire extinguisher; it’s a transparent mechanism that allows risks to be seen.” He emphasizes that a truly mature market isn’t one without risks, but one where risks can be identified early.

Guo has always believed that governance and communication are two sides of the same coin. Governance must be supported by institutions, but trust is accumulated through communication. “The market will ultimately price professionalism, but the prerequisite is that professionalism must be understood.” For companies, short-term exposure never equals trust. Only disciplined communication and long-term integrity can leave a true credit record in the market. “Investors aren’t afraid of risk; they’re afraid you’re not clear.” This simple statement is perhaps his most profound annotation on the logic of market trust.

From Concept to Structure: Making Expertise Verifiable

Jonny Zong-Lin Guo often says that the raison d’être of an association is to institutionalize ideals and make expertise verifiable. TIRI’s development has followed this logic, establishing three pillars: Certification, Connection, and Tools. These three are not just the association’s operational structure, but also the crucial foundation for the maturation of Taiwan’s capital market.

The first pillar is the TIRIC (Taiwan Investor Relations Institute Certificate) professional certification. This system moves investor relations from experience-based tradition to a knowledge system, from individual practice to verifiable expertise. “TIRIC isn’t just another piece of paper; it allows companies to instantly identify professionalism.” Guo points out that in the past, many business leaders lacked a clear understanding of the role and capability boundaries of IR. The certification system enables talent and companies to align, establishing a more stable professional standard:

“When companies know who to look for and why, the efficiency of market dialogue improves, and professionalism gets noticed.”

The second pillar is “Connection.” TIRI is dedicated to establishing a tripartite communication network among companies, investors, and the media. One of Guo’s most frequently quoted sayings is: “The market will not actively understand silence; only professionalism that is seen can be trusted.” This phrase has become the core belief driving the association’s cross-industry collaboration efforts. Beyond hosting forums and training, TIRI places great importance on establishing long-term interactive mechanisms, allowing companies and the market to form a virtuous cycle of understanding and trust:

“Often, it’s not that companies are performing poorly, but that no one knows how good they are. The purpose of connection is to ensure that true value is communicated correctly.”

The third pillar is “Tools.” The association has introduced ESG evidence chains, communication platforms, and AI analysis systems, pushing IR from traditional manual operations towards data-driven decision-making. “AI is not a threat, but a magnifying glass that helps us quickly identify what the market truly cares about.” Guo states that in an era of information overload, relying solely on human reaction is insufficient to keep pace with the market. Through the integration of data and systems, professionalism can maintain both efficiency and depth. “Expertise needs to be seen, methods need to be replicable, and tools need to be utilized effectively.”

For Guo, these three pillars represent long-term market construction. Certification defines professionalism, connection enables understanding of relationships, and tools extend trust. When ideals form an orderly system, IR becomes an engine driving the steady growth of the entire capital market.

True Internationalization is the Ability to Exchange Value

In the seven years since its founding, TIRI has established direct contacts with investor relations associations in over a dozen countries, from the US, Germany, Italy, Belgium, Turkey, Singapore, Hong Kong, and Japan, gradually building a professional network spanning Europe and Asia. It was a long and challenging road. “Initially, when we called foreign associations, they thought we were scammers. But now we can engage in dialogue as equals, introducing each other and validating each other.” This transformation, from being an “observed party” in the early days to a “cooperative partner” now, symbolizes Taiwan’s gradual establishment of a trustworthy professional position in the international capital market.

Guo consistently emphasizes that the focus of internationalization is not on overseas visits, but on the ability to generate value exchange and mutual growth. “Going out is just the first step; bringing things back is more important.” TIRI deconstructs best practices from various countries into concrete modules, then integrates and adapts them according to the characteristics of the Taiwan market.

“‘Taiwan can help’ – this phrase represents our willingness to share what we have learned and achieved with the world and move forward together.” Guo adds that this mindset allows Taiwan to no longer be just an observer or learner, but a cooperative partner capable of actively exporting materials, processes, and tools. When a market has the capacity to contribute, its voice naturally becomes an invitation rather than something to strive for.

Guo believes that IR internationalization is not just about professional connections, but also about extending trust. When Taiwan’s systems are referenced by other countries, and when Taiwan’s cases are included in international teaching materials, it demonstrates not just the association’s achievements, but the brand value of a market. “When one market can help another market become better, trust naturally gravitates towards it.” This phrase is the core belief driving his promotion of the association’s globalization.

Guo hopes that in the future, more companies will proactively participate in international dialogue, so the world remembers not only Taiwan’s industrial strength but also the professional spirit of this market. For him, IR internationalization is a long-term trust-building project, making “Taiwan” a trustworthy market language, not just a geographical term.

AI and ESG: Co-defining the Next Market Logic

Jonny Zong-Lin Guo pinpoints the next critical juncture as 2026, when the Corporate Governance Evaluation is officially upgraded to an ESG Rating. This change represents not just an adjustment in scoring criteria, but a renewal of the entire market mindset. At that point, dialogue between companies and investors will focus more on tangible environmental and social outcomes, allowing value to be concretely verified. “Previously, we only talked about Governance; next, we must clearly articulate the E (Environment) and S (Social).”

In his view, this is a process of teaching the market to “speak honestly” again. If companies cannot provide auditable ESG evidence, they are effectively closing the door on themselves, losing the qualification to engage in dialogue with international capital:

“ESG is not about image; it’s a condition for survival. When information cannot be verified, trust cannot be generated.”

Guo is also paying close attention to AI’s profound impact on IR. He believes AI’s value lies in making decisions more forward-looking and communication more precise. “AI enables faster information processing and more immediate responses, but human judgment remains the core of direction.” For him, technology and professionalism complement each other. Tools can amplify results, but direction still depends on expertise and integrity. Whether a company can maintain its initiative in the future depends on its ability to integrate technology with strategy and transparency.

Speaking about the future, he offers three practical starting points for companies. First, bilingualize all key communication materials so global investors can understand them immediately. Second, reassess the investor base, clearly distinguishing between long-term and short-term capital attributes to allow focused communication segmentation. Third, establish an ESG evidence chain, ensuring every effort is backed by traceable data:

“When IR becomes part of corporate governance, information transparency is no longer a pressure, but a capability.”

Guo points out that a company’s value never resides solely in its financial reports, but in the depth the market is willing to understand. When transparency and trust form a positive cycle, valuation naturally follows. For him, 2026 is not just a year of institutional upgrades, but the starting point of a new order. “What truly moves Taiwan forward are those willing to be understood and willing to be verified.” This has been his most sincere expectation for the market over the years:

“True trust is always built on honest demonstration. When companies dare to face the market, understanding and trust will follow.”

Recommend for you:

CAMentrepreneurs Taipei 101 ESG Forum: Governance Sets the Ceiling for Trust Capital

Flipping the IP Mindset, Rewriting the Rules of Competition! Miir Chen, Founder of FZ Patent & Trademark Ltd.: Bringing Patents into Business and Capital is Key for Companies to Seize the Initiative

The post Jonny Zong-Lin Guo, Chairman of Taiwan Investor Relations Institute: The Value of IR Lies in Making Trust Verifiable first appeared on The Icons.

On 8 December 2025, the CAMentrepreneurs Asia – Taiwan Q4 Forum, hosted by CAMentrepreneurs, the University of Cambridge’s global alumni entrepreneurs community, took place on the 57th floor of Taipei 101. The forum was co-hosted by The Icons (APAC Office) and The Executive Centre (TEC), Taipei 101, and co-organised with the support of the Cambridge Society of Taiwan, the Oxford Society of Taiwan, the Taiwan Investor Relations Institute (TIRI) and the British Chamber of Commerce in Taipei.

With the theme “From Governance to Trust Capital”, the forum brought together practitioners and thought leaders spanning business ethics, investor relations, and leadership reputation management—to examine the deeper link between governance, trust, and sustainable corporate value from multiple perspectives.

The forum was moderated by Professor Ali Ying-Che Hsieh , President of the Cambridge Society of Taiwan and Professor at the Institute of Technology Management, National Tsing Hua University. In his opening remarks, he noted that the challenge facing businesses today is no longer simply whether compliance frameworks are in place, but whether the outside world remains willing to believe in them—even when systems exist.

“If governance remains confined to internal procedures, it cannot answer market scepticism. Trust only accumulates when governance becomes behaviour that can be seen, understood, and repeatedly verified. That is when trust becomes the true source of long-term value.”

As a co-host, Vildon Foo, General Manager of The Executive Centre, Taipei, emphasised that real leadership must be accountable—towards the environment, society, and the wider communities in which businesses operate—and that this belief is embedded in TEC’s everyday choices:

“From partnering with ESG-aligned buildings such as Taipei 101, to adopting sustainable materials and energy-efficient solutions, and forming partnerships with organisations that share our values—such as The Icons, a media platform with global perspective—today’s focus on ESG leadership carries a clear message. ESG is not merely a framework or a box-ticking exercise; it is a way of thinking, and a set of choices we make every day through leadership and decision-making.”

Yang Pai-Chuan, Chief Ethics Officer at Sinyi: How Business Ethics Builds the Foundations of Trust

As Chief Ethics Officer within the Sinyi Group, Yang Pai-Chuan guided the discussion towards a less visible—but often most decisive—layer of governance: how intangible forces shape organisational behaviour over time. He observed that what truly drives decisions and actions in a company is not always what is written in policies, but what people instinctively do when rules are unclear.

In his view, executive authority manages the visible world—strategy, resource allocation, and performance outcomes—while ethical governance focuses on the internal judgement systems that cannot be easily quantified, yet operate continuously. These invisible forces determine how people navigate ambiguity, how trade-offs are made in grey areas, and whether an organisation can hold the line on trust under pressure.

“Most companies do not lose trust because of one dramatic mistake, but through gradual drift in everyday operations. Each time standards are lowered for short-term gains, or communication is sacrificed for efficiency, choices may appear reasonable in isolation. Over time, they erode the organisation’s core value base. When this drift goes unnoticed, even the most robust systems struggle to prevent trust from leaking away.”

Yang stressed that business ethics is not a restrictive framework designed to limit action. Instead, it is a thinking system that helps organisations remain consistent in complex reality. The aim is not perfection, but clarity: enabling people to recognise which behaviours damage relationships and which choices build trust. When such judgement becomes practised repeatedly and internalised as culture, trust no longer needs to be loudly promoted—it settles, naturally, into the organisation as its deepest and most difficult-to-replicate form of intangible capital.

Jonny Zong-Lin Guo, Chair of TIRI: How Investors Decide Whether a Company Merits Long-Term Trust

Speaking from the frontline of capital markets, Jonny Zong-Lin Guo , Chair of the Taiwan Investor Relations Institute (TIRI), reminded the audience that investors do not assess companies in isolation. They face an abundance of choices competing for trust simultaneously. In an environment of extreme information density, the market does not have the capacity to fully digest every company’s internal narrative. As a result, organisations must proactively establish a language of trust that can be interpreted quickly.

Guo noted that investor relations has never been about persuasion. It is about reducing uncertainty. Investors are not only asking whether a company is performing well today, but how it will respond when conditions shift, pressure rises, and difficult decisions must be made. The question is whether the company’s behavioural patterns are predictable—and whether its decision logic and values remain consistent.

“Governance assessments, ESG metrics, transparent disclosure, and timely communication form a language the market can read. They enable investors to identify, amid complexity, which companies demonstrate stable decision-making logic and a consistent value orientation. When a company shows continuity over time across these dimensions, trust accumulates—not as a short-term emotional reaction, but as a durable asset.”

He added that mature governance is not about pursuing zero risk, but about ensuring risk is visible, understood, and managed. When a company is willing to acknowledge uncertainty and explain the reasoning behind its decisions and guiding principles, the market often finds it easier—not harder—to build trust. Ultimately, that trust shows up in valuation, liquidity, and how far capital is willing to travel with the enterprise.

Harry Hsu, CEO of The Icons: In the AI Era, the Market Ultimately Assesses the Leader Behind the System

Harry Hsu, CEO of The Icons, brought the conversation to a contemporary reality that modern organisations cannot avoid: as governance frameworks and information become more transparent, the market often ends up assessing not the system itself, but the leader behind it.

He argued that in the AI era—where information is generated and amplified at speed—public understanding forms faster than ever, and trust judgements become more concentrated. Whether leaders are willing to take responsibility openly, articulate values clearly, and maintain consistency in critical moments can have a direct and disproportionate impact on corporate reputation.

“Leadership reputation is not a cosmetic add-on outside governance. It is governance leverage—amplified. When internal values and external narrative connect coherently through the leader, trust can be built far more quickly. But when leaders choose to remain hidden or ambiguous, even strong systems cannot fully compensate for market anxiety.”

Hsu added that when leaders consistently demonstrate stable judgement and decision logic over time, their reputation can accumulate into a form of trust capital that is transferable and scalable. This trust capital affects not only investors and markets, but also employees, partners and the wider stakeholder ecosystem—becoming a critical intangible resource during transformation, fundraising, and cross-border expansion.

“This is where The Icons has focused for the long term. We are not here to ‘manufacture image’ for leaders or companies. We help translate values and judgement that already exist internally—but are not yet visible to the world—into public narratives the market can understand, trust, and remember. In the AI era, the advantage is not in speaking faster. It is in being understood correctly. When understanding is established, trust follows—and becomes the most resilient form of long-term capital.”

About CAMentrepreneurs: A Cambridge-Rooted, Globally-Oriented Network of Thought and Leadership

CAMentrepreneurs, supported by the University of Cambridge and founded by prominent alumni entrepreneur Richard Lucas, is a global alumni community active across Europe, Asia and North America. Centred around Cambridge and Oxford alumni in each city, it connects founders and business leaders from technology, finance, manufacturing, sustainability, media, and innovation. Through public forums, closed-door exchanges, international collaborations and cross-city linkages, CAMentrepreneurs has developed into a network rooted in Cambridge values and driven by global perspective.

Richard Lucas has noted that, unlike communities built primarily on resource exchange or short-term deal-making, CAMentrepreneurs places emphasis on how ideas shape action, and how organisations build governance structures worthy of trust as they grow. Through cross-industry and cross-cultural dialogue, it aims to deepen exchange among leaders—so that innovation becomes not only a race of speed and scale, but also a discipline of values, choices, and long-term impact.

“For us, CAMentrepreneurs has never been solely about business or achievement. It is about how people, in a fast-changing world, still choose honesty, responsibility, and mutual trust. We are building a space where leaders from different cultures and generations can speak openly and learn from each other. Here, people do not need to prove how successful they are first. They are willing to ask what kind of value they want to leave behind in the world.”

Recommend for you:

CAMentrepreneurs Taiwan Forum: From Their Stories, Exploring the Innovative Journey from Local Resilience to the Global Stage

CAMentrepreneurs Taiwan Chapter Launches: Turning Every Local Connection into Part of a Global Whole

The post CAMentrepreneurs Taipei 101 ESG Forum: Governance Sets the Ceiling for Trust Capital first appeared on The Icons.